Hi Chandrakala,
If you did not solve your issue, could you check your data of CSV file, it should be existing greater then column define length of table.
Hope this can help you.
Regards,
Jerry
↧
Re: Error:inserted value is too large for column in HANA studio
↧
Re: Using multiple schemes with SP6
Hi Christoph,
For the current status for multiple applications (or scenarios) running on one production SAP HANA appliance where SAP Business Suite powered by SAP HANA (ERP on HANA, CRM on HANA or SCM on HANA) is installed, please see note SAP note 1826100
http://Service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1826100
Support for multiple SAP HANA based applications running with a single SAP HANA system is described in the SAP note 1661202
http://Service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1661202
Regards,
Nikhil Joy
↧
↧
Re: Can I call a procedure from a SQL Script calculation view
Hello Sagar ...It was a great help for me to figure out this .Thank you ...HANA experts Community
↧
HANA Peak Memory
All,
Is there any way that I can check what caused the Peak Memory spike on HANA? I can isolate the usage to an interval of around 2 hours but have not fund a way of checking historical statistics. I have not checked the trace files yet as was hoping there was an easier way? Ideally I would like to see whether this was a result of user initiated queries or if something internal to HANA was running.
Thanks
Kris
↧
Re: What is Referential Join
Hi Ravi, thanks for reading.
Indeed in the analytic view, MATNR from the attribute view is exposed, so I would expect that to work as an inner join as already discussed.
You can see in my script above I had executed the same statement as you mention and it was clear to me that the referential join within the analytic view was behaving as expected (Left Outer) when nothing from the right table was selected.
SELECT SUM(SALES_VAL) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AN_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
SUM(SALES_VAL)
2,500
SELECT MATNR, SUM(SALES_VAL) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AN_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
GROUP BY MATNR
MATNR;SUM(SALES_VAL)
12345;500
55667;500
67891;1,000
My only point of the long rant (thanks for reading 
), is that the referential join within an attribute view - from within the context of an analytic view - is somewhat irrelevant. The base table (left) in an attribute view is typically going to be the most detailed and hold all the keys for the attribute view itself used for joining to a fact. So the only benefit I can see for a referential join from within an attribute view is if you have a right table that is 1:1 or n:1 (kind of like text), and you don't select anything from the right - it doesn't seem logical to have a 1:N within an attribute view.
Thanks,
Justin
↧
↧
Re: Dimension restriction in an analytic privilege
Hi Benedict,
A dimension is like a characteristic in BW. Let's take this example:
| Dimension 1 | Dimension 2 | Measure 1 |
|---|---|---|
| FRANCE | PRODUCT A | 100 |
| CHINA | PRODUCT A | 50 |
| US | PRODUCT B | 20 |
So it makes perfect sense to use a OR operator for an analytical privilege on a dimension. Restrictions happen in the WHERE clause so if I'm authorized to see France and China, it will look like (just to give you an idea):
SELECT .... WHERE DIMENSION 1 = FRANCE OR CHINA
If you try this with a AND operator you will never retrieve anything as there is no dimension with a value France and China.
F the AND operation is also logical for the 2 dimensions, if you are authorized to Product B in addition of France and China. You need a AND condition otherwise you'll see non authorized information.
SELECT .... WHERE (DIMENSION 1 = FRANCE OR CHINA) AND DIMENSION 2 = PRODUCT B
Result should be empty as they were no Product B sold in France or China.
Hope I was clear enough
↧
Re: Dimension restriction in an analytic privilege
Thanks Alex. You were very clear 
If I may ask one more....
There's another line which says - "Can add several conditions per field (combined via “AND”)", and I am again confused
. What's a field and what's a dimension? are they not the same?
Benedict
↧
Re: Dimension restriction in an analytic privilege
In which guide do you see this? I didn't find it in the security guide.. this one is more difficult without context for me too
↧
Re: HANA Peak Memory
Hi Kris,
You can check the blog by Andy Silvey:
Go to point 27 and there you can find that you can use hdbcons tool to provide information about the actual used memory, the peak memory,etc.
You can also check SAP Note 1786918 - Required information to investigate high memory consumption
Regards,
Vivek
↧
↧
Re: HANA Peak Memory
Hi Kris,
Please go through below doc you will get good idea about memroy usages in HANA
http://www.saphana.com/docs/DOC-2299
BR
Atul
↧
failure during upgrade with HLM
Hi,
I started using HLM for upgrading now. Current Rev. is 60 on my HANA.
Now I got this error message that my operation system is not supported by the SAP Market Place.
ErrorMessage: Execution of 'Detects available single support packages' failed.
Detailed Mesage: Could not detect software components on system <SID> on <servername>.
Operating system linuxx86_64_sles9 is not supported by this tool. Supported operating systems are [NTAMD64, linuxx86_84, nintel, OSINEDEP].
Help: http://help.sap.com/hana
Have someone the same issue or better than a solution for it?
Is there a way to config HLM that it thinks it's an linuxx86_64 instead if linuxx86_64_sles9?
Many thanks for your help.
Marcus
↧
question about index in Hana
As far as i know that hana can automatically create a "reverted index" in column table. i also notice in SQL reference guide, that there also "create index" and also we can chage "revert index type (hash/value) " in unique constrains.
so my quesiton is:
1. what is the use case of sentence "create index", whether this index is hana's inverted index or classical DB's index
2. in which case, we should mannually create or build index to replace the one hana automatically create for us.
any hint is very appreciate
↧
Re: question about index in Hana
Hi William,
Genarally, you do not need to create index or rebuild index for column store table or view, you need to create text index by manually for colume store for text search.
You need to create index for row store table or view by manually, hana does not auto-create index for row store.
Hope this can help you.
Regards,
Jerry
↧
↧
Re: question about index in Hana
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your response. does Hana create reverted index for each column in one table.
because from one document i catch these words
"
HANA automatically creates an index for all key columns. Columns with index are marked with ‚Index Type = FULL‛ in the table definition window:
Having an index for all key columns is usually sufficient as queries will typically put filter conditions on key columns. In use cases where filter conditions are on non-key fields and tables have many records, creating an index on this non-key field might improve the performance.
The syntax to create an index is
CREATE INDEX <name> ON <table> (<column>)
"
i guess it maybe a bit out-of-date, but i am also has 2 questions: (1) what is the key column; (2) how can i found these automatically index generated by Hana
very appreciate your kindly help
Regards,
William
↧
Re: question about index in Hana
Hi William,
Yes, you understanding is right. This is memory store characteristic.
for Q1, different value of every column has own memory location, it is also stored as index, you can check hana structure guide.
for Q2, I am not sure, late I confirmed that I will answered you Q2,sorry. I do not think that we can check or find in indexs table.
Regards,
Jerry
↧
Re: Dimension restriction in an analytic privilege
Here it is,
Thanks,
Benedict
↧
Outbound data connectivity-parsing XML in server side javascript
Hi all,
I am trying to get data from a CGI service which provides the data only in XML format. I have used the xshttpdest file and xsjs file to access the service. I am able to get the data as text into a variable and display is as text.
The service returns:
<body>
<script/>
<response>
<status></response>0</status>
<hourvalue="1">
<inCount></hour>30</inCount>
<outCount>
18</outCount>
</body>
But what I want to achieve is to parse the XML file and put the data accordingly into respective tables. I am aware of such a functionality in terms of JSON format. See blog http://scn.sap.com/community/developer-center/hana/blog/2013/07/01/sap-hana-sps6--various-new-developer-features
The Outbound data connectivity section explains about such feature.
But I am getting the output in XML format and need to feed this into tables. Is there a way achieve this?
Kindly suggest any thing that can be done to get the data in tables.
Thanks & Regards,
Shreepad Patil
↧
↧
Re: SAP HANA update from revision 41 to SPS 06 revision 61
Hello Jerad,
Thank you for your input. I was able to update the HANA version from 41 to 58 with SUM. Nowe we have installed the latest HLM on our desktop but when I try the automated update from HLM to revision 62 it shows that "" Am I missing something here? Or do I have to do a manual update to revision 62?
Thanks
Dee
↧
Re: SAP HANA update from revision 41 to SPS 06 revision 61
I had to do the manual updates since the automated updating wouldn't work for me (it required me to enter proxy credentials when we don't use a proxy). I like the idea of the new HLM, but I think it's still pretty buggy. Give the manual updates a shot. That's what worked for me at least.
Jerad
↧
How can you do time dimensions and non cumulative KFs in HANA, without BW
Dear all,
I am trying to model a simple stock movement scenario using only HANA. No BW. Modeling to also Including the provisioning of data.
I know this functionality exists in sap BW, but for now, that is not an option, and so, not in the scope of my question here,
I have a totally customized application in ERP writing to Z tables.
I want a user to use Lumira or something like that, to query a HANA view, and see a snapshot of stock movement based on the stock status and date.
The challenges that I can see are ...
Records may not exist on a particular date, for a stock at a status, however, the stock can still be counted for that date.
And
When retrieving records for a given time period, we need a non cumulative measure.
Thanks in advanced
↧