Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP HANA and In-Memory Computing
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8968

Re: FusionIO vs. Hana?

$
0
0

Hey Lars,

 

Totally agree with you - Fusion-IO improves one specific piece of the HANA appliance. It does this for all single node appliances and IBM scale-out. All other vendor scale-out use SAN solutions for all data.

 

The redo logs are stored on Fusion-IO. So, Fusion-IO specifically improves the performance of loading data into SAP HANA whilst retaining the ACID properties of the database.

 

Since you can write at around 1GB/sec to a Fusion-IO card, HANA can load data into memory at up to 1GB/sec. Note that this also means that there is a theoretical improvement in replaying redo logs into memory on startup, but I've not seen that to be I/O bound.

 

Like you say, Fusion-IO does NOT (in any HANA appliance):

 

- Improve query performance

- Improve startup time (apart form redo logs)

- Store any data apart from logs

 

In many other database solutions, you would store your data on Fusion-IO so you improve the performance of cache misses, but this is not how HANA uses Fusion-IO.

 

John


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8968

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>